Chrysler Neon 1994 vs Volkswagen Scirocco 1983

 
Chrysler Neon
1994 - 1996
Volkswagen Scirocco
1983 - 1986
Body: SedanCoupe
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 133 HP90 HP
Torque: 175 NM145 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.8 seconds9.9 seconds
Chrysler Neon is more dynamic to drive.
Chrysler Neon engine produces 43 HP more power than Volkswagen Scirocco, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Volkswagen Scirocco. Thanks to more power Chrysler Neon reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.17.1
The Volkswagen Scirocco is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Chrysler Neon consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Scirocco, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Neon could require 150 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 42 litres40 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 510 km in combined cycle560 km in combined cycle
Volkswagen Scirocco gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.36 m4.05 m
Width: 1.71 m1.64 m
Height: 1.38 m1.28 m
Chrysler Neon is larger.
Chrysler Neon is 31 cm longer than the Volkswagen Scirocco, 7 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Neon is 10 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 364 litres415 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1195 litres
Volkswagen Scirocco has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Chrysler Neon has 51 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Scirocco. This could mean that the Chrysler Neon uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.5 meters
The turning circle of the Chrysler Neon is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Scirocco, which means Chrysler Neon can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6251`320
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 6001200
Pros and Cons: Chrysler Neon has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Volkswagen Scirocco has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv