Chrysler Neon 1997 vs Volvo S40 2000
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.9 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 133 HP | 136 HP | |
Torque: | 174 NM | 190 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
Chrysler Neon engine produces 3 HP less power than Volvo S40, whereas torque is 16 NM less than Volvo S40. Despite less power, Chrysler Neon reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 8.3 | |
Chrysler Neon consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Neon could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
710 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
Volvo S40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 460'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo S40 engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 11 years | 4 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Stratus, Dodge Neon | Used also on Volvo V40 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Neon might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.36 m | 4.48 m | |
Width: | 1.71 m | 1.72 m | |
Height: | 1.37 m | 1.41 m | |
Chrysler Neon is smaller. Chrysler Neon is 12 cm shorter than the Volvo S40, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Neon is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | 471 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 853 litres | |
Volvo S40 has more luggage space. Chrysler Neon has 107 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S40. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chrysler Neon is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volvo S40. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`750 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Neon has
|
Volvo S40 has
| |