Chrysler Neon 1997 vs Seat Toledo 1996
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 133 HP | 101 HP | |
| Torque: | 174 NM | 140 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Neon is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Neon engine produces 32 HP more power than Seat Toledo, whereas torque is 34 NM more than Seat Toledo. Thanks to more power Chrysler Neon reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 7.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.2 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Neon consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Neon could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Neon consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 510 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Stratus, Dodge Neon | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Seat Ibiza, Seat Cordoba | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Neon might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Chrysler Neon is larger, but lower. Chrysler Neon is 4 cm longer than the Seat Toledo, 5 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Neon is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1360 litres | |
|
Seat Toledo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chrysler Neon has 186 litres less trunk space than the Seat Toledo. This could mean that the Chrysler Neon uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Neon is 0.3 metres more than that of the Seat Toledo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`680 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Neon has
|
Seat Toledo has
| |