Chrysler Neon 1997 vs SAAB 9000 1995
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 133 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 174 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 11 seconds | |
| Chrysler Neon engine produces 17 HP less power than SAAB 9000, whereas torque is 41 NM less than SAAB 9000. Despite less power, Chrysler Neon reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 11.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.2 l/100km | 10.7 l/100km | |
|
The Chrysler Neon is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Neon consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9000, which means that by driving the Chrysler Neon over 15,000 km in a year you can save 405 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Neon consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9000. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| 510 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| SAAB 9000 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Chrysler Neon is smaller. Chrysler Neon is 43 cm shorter than the SAAB 9000, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Neon is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Neon is 0.1 metres less than that of the SAAB 9000. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Neon has
|
SAAB 9000 has
| |