Chrysler Neon 1997 vs Hyundai Lantra 1995
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 133 HP | 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 174 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Neon is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Neon engine produces 19 HP more power than Hyundai Lantra, whereas torque is 29 NM more than Hyundai Lantra. Thanks to more power Chrysler Neon reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 8.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.2 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai Lantra is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Chrysler Neon consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Lantra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Neon could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Neon consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Lantra. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| 510 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai Lantra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Stratus, Dodge Neon | Used also on Hyundai Coupe | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Neon might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.39 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chrysler Neon is 6 cm shorter than the Hyundai Lantra, 1 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Neon is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | 393 litres | |
|
Hyundai Lantra has more luggage space. Chrysler Neon has 29 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Lantra. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Neon is 0.3 metres more than that of the Hyundai Lantra. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`650 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Neon has
|
Hyundai Lantra has
| |