Chrysler Neon 1997 vs Ford Mondeo 1996

 
Chrysler Neon
1997 - 1999
Ford Mondeo
1996 - 2000
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 133 HP116 HP
Torque: 174 NM158 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.2 seconds10.9 seconds
Chrysler Neon is more dynamic to drive.
Chrysler Neon engine produces 17 HP more power than Ford Mondeo, whereas torque is 16 NM more than Ford Mondeo. Thanks to more power Chrysler Neon reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.57.8
Real fuel consumption: 9.2 l/100km8.4 l/100km
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Chrysler Neon consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Neon could require 105 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Neon consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo.
Fuel tank capacity: 47 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 550 km in combined cycle790 km in combined cycle
710 km on highway1060 km on highway
510 km with real consumption730 km with real consumption
Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.36 m4.56 m
Width: 1.71 m1.75 m
Height: 1.37 m1.37 m
Chrysler Neon is smaller.
Chrysler Neon is 20 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 364 litres480 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1290 litres
Ford Mondeo has more luggage space.
Chrysler Neon has 116 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mondeo.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters10.3 meters
The turning circle of the Chrysler Neon is 0.5 metres more than that of the Ford Mondeo, which means Chrysler Neon can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6001`750
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 600600
Pros and Cons: Chrysler Neon has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Ford Mondeo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv