Chrysler Neon 1997 vs Ford Focus 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 133 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 174 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Neon is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Neon engine produces 33 HP more power than Ford Focus, whereas torque is 29 NM more than Ford Focus. Thanks to more power Chrysler Neon reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 7.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.2 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Focus is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Neon consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Neon could require 225 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Neon consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 510 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Focus gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Stratus, Dodge Neon | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Neon might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Chrysler Neon engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.43 m | |
| Chrysler Neon and Ford Focus are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | 490 litres | |
|
Ford Focus has more luggage space. Chrysler Neon has 126 litres less trunk space than the Ford Focus. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Neon is 0.1 metres less than that of the Ford Focus. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`615 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Neon has
|
Ford Focus has
| |