Chrysler Neon 1997 vs Ford Escort 1995
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 133 HP | 90 HP | |
Torque: | 174 NM | 134 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
Chrysler Neon is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Neon engine produces 43 HP more power than Ford Escort, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Ford Escort. Thanks to more power Chrysler Neon reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 8.0 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 9.2 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
The Ford Escort is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Neon consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Escort, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Neon could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Neon consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Escort. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
710 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
510 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
Ford Escort gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.36 m | 4.29 m | |
Width: | 1.71 m | 1.68 m | |
Height: | 1.37 m | 1.35 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Chrysler Neon is 7 cm longer than the Ford Escort, 3 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Neon is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chrysler Neon is 0.8 metres more than that of the Ford Escort, which means Chrysler Neon can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`200 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | low | |
Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Neon has
|
Ford Escort has
| |