Chrysler Neon 1997 vs Chrysler Voyager 1997
Body: | Sedan | Minivan / MPV | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 133 HP | 151 HP | |
Torque: | 174 NM | 229 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 15.1 seconds | |
Chrysler Neon engine produces 18 HP less power than Chrysler Voyager, whereas torque is 55 NM less than Chrysler Voyager. Despite less power, Chrysler Neon reaches 100 km/h speed 5.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 11.9 | |
The Chrysler Neon is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Neon consumes 3.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Voyager, which means that by driving the Chrysler Neon over 15,000 km in a year you can save 510 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 75 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
Chrysler Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.36 m | 4.73 m | |
Width: | 1.71 m | 1.92 m | |
Height: | 1.37 m | 1.74 m | |
Chrysler Neon is smaller. Chrysler Neon is 37 cm shorter than the Chrysler Voyager, 21 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Neon is 37 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | 450 litres | |
Chrysler Voyager has more luggage space. Chrysler Neon has 86 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler Voyager. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chrysler Neon is 0.7 metres less than that of the Chrysler Voyager, which means Chrysler Neon can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`600 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | low | |
Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Neon has
|
Chrysler Voyager has
| |