Chrysler Neon 1997 vs Alfa Romeo 156 1997

 
Chrysler Neon
1997 - 1999
Alfa Romeo 156
1997 - 2002
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 133 HP120 HP
Torque: 174 NM144 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.2 seconds10.5 seconds
Chrysler Neon is more dynamic to drive.
Chrysler Neon engine produces 13 HP more power than Alfa Romeo 156, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Alfa Romeo 156. Thanks to more power Chrysler Neon reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.58.2
Real fuel consumption: 9.2 l/100km9.0 l/100km
By specification Chrysler Neon consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 156, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Neon could require 45 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Neon consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 156.
Fuel tank capacity: 47 litres63 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 550 km in combined cycle760 km in combined cycle
710 km on highway980 km on highway
510 km with real consumption700 km with real consumption
Alfa Romeo 156 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.36 m4.43 m
Width: 1.71 m1.74 m
Height: 1.37 m1.42 m
Chrysler Neon is smaller.
Chrysler Neon is 7 cm shorter than the Alfa Romeo 156, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Neon is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 364 litres380 litres
Chrysler Neon has 16 litres less trunk space than the Alfa Romeo 156.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Chrysler Neon is 0.3 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo 156.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6001`750
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 6001000
Pros and Cons: Chrysler Neon has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Alfa Romeo 156 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv