Chrysler Neon 1997 vs Alfa Romeo 156 1997
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 133 HP | 120 HP | |
Torque: | 174 NM | 144 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
Chrysler Neon is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Neon engine produces 13 HP more power than Alfa Romeo 156, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Alfa Romeo 156. Thanks to more power Chrysler Neon reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 8.2 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 9.2 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
By specification Chrysler Neon consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 156, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Neon could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Neon consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 156. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 63 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
710 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
510 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Alfa Romeo 156 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.36 m | 4.43 m | |
Width: | 1.71 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.37 m | 1.42 m | |
Chrysler Neon is smaller. Chrysler Neon is 7 cm shorter than the Alfa Romeo 156, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Neon is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | 380 litres | |
Chrysler Neon has 16 litres less trunk space than the Alfa Romeo 156. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chrysler Neon is 0.3 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo 156. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`750 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 600 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Neon has
|
Alfa Romeo 156 has
| |