Chrysler Neon 1997 vs Volkswagen Vento 1992
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 133 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 174 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Neon is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Neon engine produces 43 HP more power than Volkswagen Vento, whereas torque is 29 NM more than Volkswagen Vento. Thanks to more power Chrysler Neon reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 8.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.2 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Vento is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Neon consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Vento, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Neon could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Neon consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Vento. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 510 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Vento gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Stratus, Dodge Neon | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Seat Toledo, Seat Ibiza, Seat Cordoba | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.42 m | |
| Chrysler Neon is 2 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Vento, 1 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Neon is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Neon is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Vento. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Neon has
|
Volkswagen Vento has
| |