Chrysler Neon 1997 vs Chrysler Stratus 1995
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 133 HP | 161 HP | |
Torque: | 174 NM | 218 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
Chrysler Neon engine produces 28 HP less power than Chrysler Stratus, whereas torque is 44 NM less than Chrysler Stratus. Despite less power, Chrysler Neon reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 10.7 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 9.2 l/100km | 10.8 l/100km | |
The Chrysler Neon is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Neon consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Stratus, which means that by driving the Chrysler Neon over 15,000 km in a year you can save 330 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Neon consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Stratus. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
710 km on highway | 740 km on highway | ||
510 km with real consumption | 550 km with real consumption | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.36 m | 4.75 m | |
Width: | 1.71 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.37 m | 1.37 m | |
Chrysler Neon is smaller. Chrysler Neon is 39 cm shorter than the Chrysler Stratus, 11 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chrysler Neon is 0.2 metres less than that of the Chrysler Stratus. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`200 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 600 | 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Neon has
|
Chrysler Stratus has
| |