Chrysler Neon 1997 vs Chrysler Stratus 1998
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 133 HP | 131 HP | |
Torque: | 174 NM | 174 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
Chrysler Neon is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Neon engine produces 2 HP more power than Chrysler Stratus, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Chrysler Neon reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 9.6 | |
The Chrysler Neon is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Neon consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Stratus, which means that by driving the Chrysler Neon over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
710 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
Chrysler Stratus gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 380'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 11 years | 11 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.36 m | 4.75 m | |
Width: | 1.71 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.37 m | 1.37 m | |
Chrysler Neon is smaller. Chrysler Neon is 39 cm shorter than the Chrysler Stratus, 11 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chrysler Neon is 0.2 metres less than that of the Chrysler Stratus. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`200 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 600 | 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Neon has
|
Chrysler Stratus has
| |