Chrysler Neon 1997 vs BMW 3 series 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 133 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 174 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Chrysler Neon engine produces 17 HP less power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 16 NM less than BMW 3 series. Despite less power, Chrysler Neon reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 8.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.2 l/100km | 9.5 l/100km | |
|
By specification Chrysler Neon consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that by driving the Chrysler Neon over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Neon consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| 510 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Stratus, Dodge Neon | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW Z3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Neon might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Chrysler Neon is smaller. Chrysler Neon is 11 cm shorter than the BMW 3 series, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Neon is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | 440 litres | |
|
BMW 3 series has more luggage space. Chrysler Neon has 76 litres less trunk space than the BMW 3 series. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Neon is 0.8 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Chrysler Neon can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`865 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Neon has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |