Chrysler Neon 1997 vs Chrysler Neon 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 152 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Neon 1999 is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Neon 1997 engine produces 7 HP less power than Chrysler Neon 1999, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Chrysler Neon 1999. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Neon 1997 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 8.5 | |
| Chrysler Neon 1997 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Neon 1999, which means that by driving the Chrysler Neon 1997 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km on highway | 670 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.42 m | |
| Chrysler Neon 1997 is 3 cm shorter than the Chrysler Neon 1999, width is practically the same , while the height of Chrysler Neon 1997 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | 370 litres | |
| Chrysler Neon 1997 has 6 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler Neon 1999. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Neon has
|
Chrysler Neon has
| |