Chrysler Neon 1999 vs Seat Toledo 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 133 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 177 NM | 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Seat Toledo is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Neon engine produces 23 HP more power than Seat Toledo, but torque is 58 NM less than Seat Toledo. Despite the higher power, Chrysler Neon reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 5.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.5 l/100km | 5.5 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Neon consumes 3.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Neon could require 570 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Neon consumes 5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 530 km in combined cycle | 1100 km in combined cycle | |
| 670 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 440 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Seat Toledo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Stratus, Dodge Neon | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Audi A6, Seat Alhambra, Seat Leon | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chrysler Neon is 5 cm shorter than the Seat Toledo, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Neon is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Neon is 0.1 metres less than that of the Seat Toledo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Neon has
|
Seat Toledo has
| |