Chrysler Neon 1999 vs Honda Civic 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 133 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 177 NM | 152 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
| Chrysler Neon engine produces 23 HP more power than Honda Civic, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Honda Civic. Despite the higher power, Chrysler Neon reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.5 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Honda Civic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Neon consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Neon could require 285 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Neon consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 530 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 670 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 440 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda Civic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.46 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chrysler Neon is 7 cm shorter than the Honda Civic, width is practically the same , while the height of Chrysler Neon is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 450 litres | |
|
Honda Civic has more luggage space. Chrysler Neon has 80 litres less trunk space than the Honda Civic. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`570 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Neon has
|
Honda Civic has
| |