Chrysler Neon 1999 vs Chrysler PT Cruiser 2000
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 188 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
| Chrysler Neon engine produces 18 HP less power than Chrysler PT Cruiser, whereas torque is 28 NM less than Chrysler PT Cruiser. Despite less power, Chrysler Neon reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 9.8 | |
|
The Chrysler Neon is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Neon consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler PT Cruiser, which means that by driving the Chrysler Neon over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 670 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
| Chrysler PT Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Chrysler Neon is larger, but lower. Chrysler Neon is 10 cm longer than the Chrysler PT Cruiser, 1 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Neon is 18 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Neon is 0.3 metres less than that of the Chrysler PT Cruiser. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Neon has
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
| |