Chrysler Neon 1999 vs Audi A3 1996
Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 122 HP | 125 HP | |
Torque: | 160 NM | 173 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
Chrysler Neon engine produces 3 HP less power than Audi A3, whereas torque is 13 NM less than Audi A3. Despite less power, Chrysler Neon reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 8.9 | |
Chrysler Neon consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3, which means that by driving the Chrysler Neon over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
670 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
Audi A3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.39 m | 4.15 m | |
Width: | 1.71 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
Chrysler Neon is 24 cm longer than the Audi A3, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 350 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1110 litres | |
Chrysler Neon has 20 litres more trunk space than the Audi A3. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chrysler Neon is 0.1 metres less than that of the Audi A3. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`650 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Neon has
|
Audi A3 has
| |