Chrysler Neon 1994 vs Honda Accord 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 | 1.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 133 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 152 - 175 NM | 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 11.1 seconds | 11.1 - 12.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 - 8.5 | 8.6 - 9.5 | |
|
Chrysler Neon petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Honda Accord. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Chrysler Neon is smaller. Chrysler Neon is 24 cm shorter than the Honda Accord, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Neon is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Neon is 0.5 metres less than that of the Honda Accord, which means Chrysler Neon can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`610 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Neon has
|
| |