Chrysler Neon 1994 vs Volkswagen Scirocco 1981
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Sedan | Coupe | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 | 1.3 - 1.8 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 - 133 HP | 60 - 139 HP | |
Torque: | 152 - 175 NM | 93 - 168 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 11.1 seconds | 8 - 14.8 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 - 8.5 | 7.1 - 8.8 | |
Chrysler Neon petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Scirocco. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.36 m | 4.05 m | |
Width: | 1.71 m | 1.63 m | |
Height: | 1.37 m | 1.29 m | |
Chrysler Neon is larger. Chrysler Neon is 31 cm longer than the Volkswagen Scirocco, 8 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Neon is 8 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | 415 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1195 litres | |
Volkswagen Scirocco has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chrysler Neon has 51 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Scirocco. This could mean that the Chrysler Neon uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chrysler Neon is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Scirocco, which means Chrysler Neon can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`610 | ~ 1`245 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 600 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Neon has
|
Volkswagen Scirocco has
| |