Chrysler Neon 1994 vs Chrysler Stratus 1995
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 133 HP | 131 - 161 HP | |
| Torque: | 152 - 175 NM | 174 - 218 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 11.1 seconds | 10.5 - 10.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 - 8.5 | 8.2 - 10.7 | |
|
Chrysler Neon petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chrysler Stratus. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Chrysler Neon is smaller, but slightly higher. Chrysler Neon is 39 cm shorter than the Chrysler Stratus, 11 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Neon is 0.1 metres less than that of the Chrysler Stratus. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`610 | ~ 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Neon has
|
| |