Chrysler Neon 1999 vs Ford Mondeo 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol) | 1.8 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 133 HP | 90 - 226 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 - 177 NM | 165 - 330 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 12.8 seconds | 7.4 - 12.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 - 8.8 | 5.7 - 10.7 | |
|
Chrysler Neon petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Mondeo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Chrysler Neon is smaller. Chrysler Neon is 34 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Neon is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 500 litres | |
|
Ford Mondeo has more luggage space. Chrysler Neon has 130 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Neon is 0.3 metres less than that of the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`613 | ~ 1`939 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Neon has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |