Chrysler Neon 1999 vs Chrysler PT Cruiser 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol) | 1.6 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 133 HP | 115 - 223 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 - 177 NM | 157 - 332 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 12.8 seconds | 7.5 - 13.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 - 8.8 | 6.9 - 10.5 | |
|
Chrysler Neon petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chrysler PT Cruiser. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Chrysler Neon is larger, but lower. Chrysler Neon is 7 cm longer than the Chrysler PT Cruiser, width is practically the same , while the height of Chrysler Neon is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Neon is 0.3 metres less than that of the Chrysler PT Cruiser. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`613 | ~ 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Neon has
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
| |