Chrysler Grand Voyager 1994 vs Mitsubishi Space Runner 1991
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.3 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 162 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 43 HP more power than Mitsubishi Space Runner, whereas torque is 98 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Runner. Despite the higher power, Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 8.8 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Runner is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 330 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chrysler Grand Voyager engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 23 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Chrysler Voyager, Dodge Grand Caravan, Chrysler Concorde | Used also on Mitsubishi Space Wagon | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 63 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, 13 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 328 litres | 676 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3990 litres | 1498 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Chrysler Grand Voyager has 348 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Space Runner. This could mean that the Chrysler Grand Voyager uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 2492 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 13.2 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 3 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Runner, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`550 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
| |