Chrysler Grand Voyager 1994 vs Chrysler Voyager 1991
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.3 Petrol | 3.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 241 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 13 HP more power than Chrysler Voyager, whereas torque is 19 NM more than Chrysler Voyager. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 12.4 | |
|
The Chrysler Grand Voyager is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Voyager, which means that by driving the Chrysler Grand Voyager over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.72 m | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager is 38 cm longer than the Chrysler Voyager, width is practically the same , while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 328 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3990 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.2 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.7 metres more than that of the Chrysler Voyager, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`550 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Chrysler Voyager has
| |