Chrysler Grand Voyager 1992 vs Ford Galaxy 1995

 
Chrysler Grand Voyager
1992 - 1995
Ford Galaxy
1995 - 2000
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.5 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 118 HP90 HP
Torque: 250 NM202 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.5 seconds17.1 seconds
Chrysler Grand Voyager is more dynamic to drive.
Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 28 HP more power than Ford Galaxy, whereas torque is 48 NM more than Ford Galaxy. Thanks to more power Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.76.5
Real fuel consumption: 7.8 l/100km6.7 l/100km
The Ford Galaxy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 180 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres75 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 970 km in combined cycle1150 km in combined cycle
960 km with real consumption1110 km with real consumption
Ford Galaxy gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.90 m4.62 m
Width: 1.83 m1.80 m
Height: 1.74 m1.73 m
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger.
Chrysler Grand Voyager is 28 cm longer than the Ford Galaxy, 3 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 3990 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
3990 litresno data
Turning diameter: 13.2 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 2.1 metres more than that of the Ford Galaxy, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`5502`000
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 1600800
Pros and Cons: Chrysler Grand Voyager has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Ford Galaxy has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv