Chrysler Grand Voyager 1992 vs Chrysler Voyager 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Chrysler Grand Voyager) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Chrysler Voyager) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 118 HP | 99 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 179 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 15.2 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 19 HP more power than Chrysler Voyager, whereas torque is 71 NM more than Chrysler Voyager. Thanks to more power Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 10.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 9.9 l/100km | |
|
The Chrysler Grand Voyager is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Voyager, which means that by driving the Chrysler Grand Voyager over 15,000 km in a year you can save 390 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Voyager. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Chrysler Grand Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.67 m | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager is 38 cm longer than the Chrysler Voyager, width is practically the same , while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 3990 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3990 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.2 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.7 metres more than that of the Chrysler Voyager, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`550 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Chrysler Voyager has
| |