Chrysler Grand Voyager 1992 vs Opel Combo 1993
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Chrysler Grand Voyager) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Opel Combo) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 118 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 103 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 58 HP more power than Opel Combo, whereas torque is 147 NM more than Opel Combo. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | no data | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | no data | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 3990 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3990 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`550 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Opel Combo has
| |