Chrysler Grand Voyager 2011 vs Volvo XC90 2010
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 283 HP | 243 HP | |
| Torque: | 352 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 40 HP more power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 32 NM more than Volvo XC90. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.6 | 11.5 | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 500'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo XC90 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler Town & Country | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Grand Voyager might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Chrysler Grand Voyager 2011 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles.
After ... More about Chrysler Grand Voyager 2011 3.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.18 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger, but slightly lower. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 37 cm longer than the Volvo XC90, 9 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 613 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1837 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.07 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.43 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`690 | 2`760 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 8600 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |