Chrysler Grand Voyager 2011 vs Toyota Sienna 2010
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 2.7 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 283 HP | 187 HP | |
Torque: | 352 NM | 252 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 96 HP more power than Toyota Sienna, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Toyota Sienna. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.6 | 11.2 | |
Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Sienna, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chrysler Grand Voyager engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 15 years | 17 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler Town & Country | Used also on Lexus RX, Toyota Highlander | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Grand Voyager might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Chrysler Grand Voyager 2011 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles.
After ... More about Chrysler Grand Voyager 2011 3.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.18 m | 5.09 m | |
Width: | 2.00 m | 1.99 m | |
Height: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 9 cm longer than the Toyota Sienna, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 993 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 3810 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 12.07 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.67 metres more than that of the Toyota Sienna, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`690 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 8600 | 18 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Toyota Sienna has
| |