Chrysler Grand Voyager 2011 vs Volvo XC90 2010
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager and Volvo XC90 have the same engine power, but Chrysler Grand Voyager torque is 20 NM more than Volvo XC90. Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 8.5 | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that by driving the Chrysler Grand Voyager over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| Chrysler Grand Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.18 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger, but slightly lower. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 37 cm longer than the Volvo XC90, 9 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 638 litres | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 638 litres | 613 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3296 litres | 1837 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Chrysler Grand Voyager has more luggage space (by 25 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 1459 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`775 | 2`680 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 8600 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |