Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008 vs Toyota Sienna 2005
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 193 HP | 266 HP | |
Torque: | 305 NM | 344 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 73 HP less power than Toyota Sienna, whereas torque is 39 NM less than Toyota Sienna. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.7 | 13.0 | |
Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Sienna, which means that by driving the Chrysler Grand Voyager over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 76 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
820 km on highway | 670 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.14 m | 5.11 m | |
Width: | 1.95 m | 1.97 m | |
Height: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 4 cm longer than the Toyota Sienna, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 638 litres | 1235 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3296 litres | 4217 litres | |
Toyota Sienna has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chrysler Grand Voyager has 597 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Sienna. This could mean that the Chrysler Grand Voyager uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Sienna (by 921 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`690 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 4600 | 7400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Toyota Sienna has
| |