Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008 vs Mercedes Vito 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.1 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 68 HP more power than Mercedes Vito, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Mercedes Vito. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chrysler Grand Voyager) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes Vito) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jeep Cherokee, Jeep Wrangler, Dodge Nitro | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes A klase | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes Vito might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.14 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.95 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.90 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger, but lower. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 38 cm longer than the Mercedes Vito, 5 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 638 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3296 litres | no data | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has more luggage capacity. Chrysler Grand Voyager has 208 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes Vito. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mercedes Vito. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`775 | 3`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 17 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Mercedes Vito has
| |