Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008 vs Ford Galaxy 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.3 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Chrysler Grand Voyager) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Ford Galaxy) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 161 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 208 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 2 HP more power than Ford Galaxy, whereas torque is 152 NM more than Ford Galaxy. Despite the higher power, Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 9.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.8 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km | |
|
The Chrysler Grand Voyager is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that by driving the Chrysler Grand Voyager over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Chrysler Grand Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.14 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.95 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 32 cm longer than the Ford Galaxy, 10 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 638 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 390 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 638 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
3296 litres | 2325 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 971 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.3 metres more than that of the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`775 kg | 2`415 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`100 kg | 1`625 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 675 kg | 790 kg | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 17 procentiem less than Ford Galaxy. Therefore, Ford Galaxy is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |