Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008 vs Chrysler Voyager 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 149 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 14 HP more power than Chrysler Voyager, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 8.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.8 l/100km | 9.5 l/100km | |
|
The Chrysler Voyager is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Voyager, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Voyager. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Chrysler Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jeep Cherokee, Jeep Wrangler, Dodge Nitro | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Grand Voyager might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.14 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.95 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager is 33 cm longer than the Chrysler Voyager, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 638 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3296 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.4 metres more than that of the Chrysler Voyager, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`775 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Chrysler Voyager has
| |