Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 149 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008 engine produces 14 HP more power than Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite the higher power, Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 8.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.8 l/100km | 10.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008 could require 120 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 1110 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jeep Cherokee, Jeep Wrangler, Dodge Nitro | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.14 m | 5.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.95 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008 is 4 cm longer than the Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 638 litres | 920 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3296 litres | 4130 litres | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008 has 282 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004. This could mean that the Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 (by 834 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`775 | 2`630 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
| |