Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008 vs Toyota Sienna 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 3.3 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Chrysler Grand Voyager) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Toyota Sienna) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 215 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 301 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 52 HP less power than Toyota Sienna, but torque is 59 NM more than Toyota Sienna. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 10.7 | |
|
The Chrysler Grand Voyager is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Sienna, which means that by driving the Chrysler Grand Voyager over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| Chrysler Grand Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.14 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.95 m | 1.97 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 6 cm longer than the Toyota Sienna, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 638 litres | 1235 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3296 litres | 4217 litres | |
|
Toyota Sienna has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chrysler Grand Voyager has 597 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Sienna. This could mean that the Chrysler Grand Voyager uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Sienna (by 921 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`775 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Toyota Sienna has
| |