Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008 vs Renault Trafic 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 290 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 49 HP more power than Renault Trafic, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Renault Trafic. Despite the higher power, Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 4.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 7.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.8 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Trafic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Trafic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Trafic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 1180 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Trafic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jeep Cherokee, Jeep Wrangler, Dodge Nitro | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Opel Vivaro, Nissan Primastar | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.14 m | 5.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.95 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.96 m | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager is 4 cm shorter than the Renault Trafic, 5 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 21 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 638 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3296 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`775 | 2`825 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Renault Trafic has
| |