Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008 vs Renault Grand Espace 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 13.9 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 23 HP more power than Renault Grand Espace, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Renault Grand Espace. Thanks to more power Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 9.2 | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Grand Espace, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| Chrysler Grand Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jeep Cherokee, Jeep Wrangler, Dodge Nitro | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Espace, Renault VEL Satis | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Grand Voyager might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.14 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.95 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 28 cm longer than the Renault Grand Espace, 9 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 638 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 456 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 638 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
3296 litres | 3050 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 246 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.5 metres more than that of the Renault Grand Espace, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`775 kg | 2`665 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`100 kg | 1`980 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 675 kg | 685 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
| |