Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008 vs Renault Grand Espace 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 13 HP more power than Renault Grand Espace, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Renault Grand Espace. Despite the higher power, Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 6.5 | |
|
The Renault Grand Espace is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Grand Espace, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 420 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| Renault Grand Espace gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jeep Cherokee, Jeep Wrangler, Dodge Nitro | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Grand Espace might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Grand Espace 2010 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.14 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.95 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 28 cm longer than the Renault Grand Espace, 9 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 638 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 456 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 638 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
3296 litres | 3050 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 246 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.5 metres more than that of the Renault Grand Espace, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`775 kg | 2`610 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`100 kg | 2`006 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 675 kg | 604 kg | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem more than Renault Grand Espace. Therefore, Chrysler Grand Voyager is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Renault Grand Espace has
| |