Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008 vs Kia Carnival 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 185 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 343 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 22 HP less power than Kia Carnival, but torque is 17 NM more than Kia Carnival. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 7.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.8 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
|
The Chrysler Grand Voyager is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Carnival, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 225 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Carnival. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jeep Cherokee, Jeep Wrangler, Dodge Nitro | Used also on Hyundai Terracan | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.14 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.95 m | 1.98 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.82 m | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager is 33 cm longer than the Kia Carnival, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 638 litres | 364 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
3296 litres | 1666 litres | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has more luggage capacity. Chrysler Grand Voyager has 274 litres more trunk space than the Kia Carnival. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 1630 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.3 metres more than that of the Kia Carnival. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`775 kg | 2`920 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`100 kg | 2`114 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 675 kg | 806 kg | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 19 procentiem less than Kia Carnival. Therefore, Kia Carnival is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Kia Carnival has
| |