Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008 vs Hyundai H1 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 392 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 14.5 seconds | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 7 HP less power than Hyundai H1, whereas torque is 32 NM less than Hyundai H1. Despite less power, Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 8.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.8 l/100km | 10.0 l/100km | |
|
By specification Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai H1, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 120 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai H1. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chrysler Grand Voyager) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Hyundai H1) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.14 m | 5.13 m | |
| Width: | 1.95 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.93 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger, but lower. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 2 cm longer than the Hyundai H1, 3 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 18 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 638 litres | 851 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3296 litres | no data | |
|
Hyundai H1 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chrysler Grand Voyager has 213 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai H1. This could mean that the Chrysler Grand Voyager uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.7 metres more than that of the Hyundai H1, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`775 | 3`030 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Hyundai H1 has
| |