Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008 vs Hyundai H1 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 343 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 47 HP more power than Hyundai H1, whereas torque is 17 NM more than Hyundai H1. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 8.3 | |
|
The Hyundai H1 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai H1, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
| Hyundai H1 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chrysler Grand Voyager) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Hyundai H1) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.14 m | 5.13 m | |
| Width: | 1.95 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.93 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger, but lower. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 2 cm longer than the Hyundai H1, 3 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 18 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 638 litres | 851 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3296 litres | no data | |
|
Hyundai H1 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chrysler Grand Voyager has 213 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai H1. This could mean that the Chrysler Grand Voyager uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.7 metres more than that of the Hyundai H1, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`775 | 3`030 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Hyundai H1 has
| |