Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 vs Kia Carnival 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.3 Petrol | 2.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 144 HP | |
| Torque: | 285 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.2 seconds | 16.4 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 36 HP more power than Kia Carnival, but torque is 25 NM less than Kia Carnival. Thanks to more power Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.7 | 8.8 | |
|
The Kia Carnival is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 3.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Carnival, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 585 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| Kia Carnival gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Chrysler Voyager, Chrysler Town & Country | Used also on Hyundai Terracan | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 4.93 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 18 cm longer than the Kia Carnival, 10 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 920 litres | 302 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4130 litres | no data | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has more luggage capacity. Chrysler Grand Voyager has 618 litres more trunk space than the Kia Carnival. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 13 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 1 metres less than that of the Kia Carnival, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`670 | 2`665 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Kia Carnival has
| |