Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2000

 
Chrysler Grand Voyager
2004 - 2007
Volkswagen Sharan
2000 - 2010
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.8 Diesel2.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 149 HP204 HP
Torque: 360 NM265 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12 seconds10.4 seconds
Volkswagen Sharan is a more dynamic driving.
Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 55 HP less power than Volkswagen Sharan, but torque is 95 NM more than Volkswagen Sharan. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.511.9
Real fuel consumption: 10.2 l/100km12.8 l/100km
The Chrysler Grand Voyager is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 3.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that by driving the Chrysler Grand Voyager over 15,000 km in a year you can save 510 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 880 km in combined cycle580 km in combined cycle
1110 km on highway760 km on highway
730 km with real consumption540 km with real consumption
Chrysler Grand Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 5.10 m4.63 m
Width: 2.00 m1.81 m
Height: 1.75 m1.73 m
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger.
Chrysler Grand Voyager is 47 cm longer than the Volkswagen Sharan, 19 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 920 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
4130 litresno data
Turning diameter: 12 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 1.1 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Sharan, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`6302`000
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 20002600
Rating in user reviews: 8.1/10 6.1/10
Pros and Cons: Chrysler Grand Voyager has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Volkswagen Sharan has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv