Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 vs Chrysler Voyager 2007
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 149 HP | 149 HP | |
Torque: | 360 NM | 360 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Chrysler Grand Voyager and Chrysler Voyager have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | no data | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.10 m | 4.81 m | |
Width: | 2.00 m | 2.00 m | |
Height: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
Chrysler Grand Voyager is 29 cm longer than the Chrysler Voyager, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 920 litres | 440 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4130 litres | no data | |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has more luggage capacity. Chrysler Grand Voyager has 480 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler Voyager. | |||
Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.5 metres more than that of the Chrysler Voyager, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`630 | 1`600 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | low | |
Average price (€): | 1600 | 1800 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.1/10 | 8.1/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
| |