Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 149 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 engine produces 14 HP less power than Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite less power, Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 9.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 9.8 l/100km | |
|
By specification Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008, which means that by driving the Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 1110 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jeep Cherokee, Jeep Wrangler, Dodge Nitro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 5.14 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.95 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 is 4 cm shorter than the Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 920 litres | 638 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4130 litres | 3296 litres | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 has 282 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008. The Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 (by 834 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`630 | 2`775 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
| |