Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 vs Toyota Previa 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 149 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 33 HP more power than Toyota Previa, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Toyota Previa. Thanks to more power Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Previa is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Previa, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Previa. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Previa gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chrysler Grand Voyager engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota RAV4, Toyota Corolla Verso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Previa might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Chrysler Grand Voyager engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Previa 2003 2.0 engine: The engine was known for its solid technical characteristics.
One of its drawbacks is the lack of hydraulic lifters, requiring periodic valve clearance adjustments. The next-generation 1AD-FTV engine was equipped with ... More about Toyota Previa 2003 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger, but slightly lower. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 32 cm longer than the Toyota Previa, 21 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 920 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4130 litres | 2370 litres | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has more luggage capacity. Chrysler Grand Voyager has 425 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Previa. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 1760 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Previa, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`630 | 2`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Toyota Previa has
| |