Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 vs Renault Trafic 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 149 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 14.9 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 49 HP more power than Renault Trafic, whereas torque is 120 NM more than Renault Trafic. Thanks to more power Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 8.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Trafic is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Trafic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Trafic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 1110 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 1150 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Trafic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volvo V40, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Volvo S40, Mitsubishi Carisma | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Trafic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Chrysler Grand Voyager engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Renault Trafic 2001 1.9 engine: Long-lasting and fuel-efficient engine. Maintaining oil change and maintenance intervals is essential for a long engine life, as poor or untimely oil changes can result in turbine and oil pump damage, followed ... More about Renault Trafic 2001 1.9 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.97 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger, but lower. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 32 cm longer than the Renault Trafic, 10 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 22 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 920 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4130 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`630 | 2`925 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Renault Trafic has
| |